Once again I felt it, previously I wrote my experience of beautiful night I witnessed from my rooftop, this time it is not so beautiful scenario, a “syndicate of situations” which I’ve resisted to digest (perfectly digested now). I still wonder how the geniuses have formulated theories that would often predict the certainty of an even to occur.
Considering “mutually exclusive” and “mutually inclusive” (I hope I’m not speaking too much of mathematics, even I’m scared of it) terms as we see in prediction theories, I’ve learnt things, things that to some extent made my decisions to hit bull’s eye (I mean not “the bull’s eye”) and still I feel I miss something, like, why an even is governed by more than one propellant.
Ah, another thought hit me just now!!
If occurrence of an event is governed by more than one propellant, then the likelihood of the predicted event will change in the direction to satisfy the strongest propellant (I know I’m speaking gibberish to most of you.), then is there a predefined strong propellant for an event to occur? If there is one, how good are we to identify it? And manipulate it for larger good.
That’s deviation from my actual talk of “events and propellants” but a worthy deviation (about end results).
Should I allow more of thought to infiltrate this page?? Naaa I’ll stop it here . . . an abrupt end for now!